liveBook · Manning

HandleFaultyContent strategy

As explained in Building User-Friendly DSLs

A book-specific fault-handling strategy that adapts or defaults invalid DSL content so processing can continue without crashing.

HandleFaultyContent strengthens a DSL generator so incomplete or invalid AST content does not make it crash. Instead of assuming every value has the expected shape, generator helpers check their inputs and emit a fallback value or problem marker, allowing generation to continue. section 9.2.1 section 9.4

Use it alongside constraints, not as a substitute for them. Constraints tell domain experts what to fix; fault handling protects generation when reported issues are still present. The resulting code may be invalid or meaningless, so completing generation is only an intermediate success. section 9.4 section 9.2.1

Implement the strategy defensively:

Missing attribute name

A missing name can reach camelCase as undefined. Rather than throwing, camelCase returns a diagnostic-looking identifier. withFirstUpper needs the same guard; otherwise it can still fail on undefined. Generation then finishes, while the missing name remains an issue to resolve. section 9.2.2 section 9.2.1

Listing 9.12 The changed content in src/generator/template-utils.js
const camelCase = (str) => typeof str === "string"             #1
    ? str 
        .toLowerCase() 
        .replace(/\s+([a-z])/g, (_, ch) => ch.toUpperCase()) 
        .replace(" ", "") 
    : "__generationProblemDueToNonStringArgumentToCamelCase" 
module.exports.camelCase = camelCase 

const withFirstUpper = (str) => typeof str === "string"       
    ? str.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + str.substring(1) 
    : "GenerationProblemDueToNonStringArgumentToWithFirstUpper" 
module.exports.withFirstUpper = withFirstUpper

Compare guarded camelCase and withFirstUpper implementations: each preserves normal string handling while returning a named fallback for non-string input. section 9.3.6

How Building User-Friendly DSLs covers it

How deep it goes
Works through input guards and fallback generated output, while noting that successful generation need not yield a buildable Runtime.
Examples
Uses missing attribute names, undefined utility arguments, incomplete ASTs, and malformed expression values.
What it assumes
Assumes JavaScript functions and AST-based generation, while demonstrating defensive checks for undefined and non-string values.
What you can do after
Apply it by guarding generator inputs and emitting fallback identifiers or diagnostic comments instead of throwing.
How it connects
Connects generator error handling with ASTs, constraints, persistence, build steps, and Runtime execution.

Related concepts

This explainer was generated by Manning's knowledge graph from the text of Building User-Friendly DSLs. The section links point to the parts of the book it draws on.