Confidence calibration measures whether an agent’s confidence tracks the correctness of its answers. Saying “I’m not sure” is not enough: verbal confidence can differ from signals that better predict correctness. section 10.1.4
Useful signals include token probabilities, retrieval scores, and consistency among evidence. Token-likelihood measures are described as better predictors of correctness than verbal expressions of confidence. section 10.1.4
To evaluate calibration:
- Run the same diagnostic queries against two agent configurations; measure correctness, calibration, graceful uncertainty, and average tokens consumed. section 10.4.2
- Compare an agent with an empty knowledge graph against the same agent after 20 tasks; assess whether accumulated experience improves calibration. section 10.4.2
Measure calibration across queries
For ten queries of varying difficulty, record confidence and ground-truth correctness. Compute their correlation, plot confidence buckets against actual accuracy, and compare the results with a flat ReAct agent. section 10.5

