liveBook · Manning

Devil's advocate question

As explained in Architecture Modernization: Socio-technical alignment of software, strategy, and structure

A devil's advocate question constructively challenges a person’s stated belief by asking them to examine an opposing possibility.

A devil’s advocate question constructively tests a stated belief by asking someone to consider an opposing position. In a listening tour, it can open up exploration of priorities rather than leave an assumption unexamined. section 4.3.3

Testing a modernization priority

If someone says investment in new products is key, ask: “Are you 100% convinced that reducing operating costs is the wrong focus, and nothing would change your mind?” section 4.3.3

Deliver the question skillfully. Make clear that the aim is exploration, not a direct challenge or an insult. section 4.3.3

How Architecture Modernization: Socio-technical alignment of software, strategy, and structure covers it

How deep it goes
Defines the question through one example and a delivery caution, without a step-by-step method.
Examples
Contrasts investment in new products with reducing operating costs as a modernization priority.
What you can do after
Practice/perform constructive challenges that invite exploration without sounding insulting.
How it connects
Connects to listening tours, question formats, questionnaires, surveys, and workshops.

This explainer was generated by Manning's knowledge graph from the text of Architecture Modernization: Socio-technical alignment of software, strategy, and structure. The section links point to the parts of the book it draws on.