Format-agnostic evaluation scores whether a model produces the correct answer without making success depend on an unrelated output template. Rigid suffixes, answer labels, or regular-expression extraction can turn capable responses into apparent failures when generation does not match the evaluation format. section 16.1.1
Practical evaluation choices include:
- Use log-likelihood scoring when the task lacks a question-and-answer format, especially in pretraining evaluation. section 16.1.1
- Treat exact match cautiously in post-training evaluation when answers may omit required phrases such as “The answer is:” or use unexpected wording. section 16.1.1
- Design extraction and prompting so formatting does not bottleneck the capability being measured; achieving this generally requires substantial iteration. section 16.1.1
Multiple-choice output
A prompt that demands “Correct Answer: (A)” may mark a response incorrect if the model gives the right explanation without the label. A format-agnostic evaluator separates answer correctness from compliance with that template. section 16.1.1
