Goodharting occurs when optimizing a proxy measure makes it less reliable as an indicator of the underlying goal. In RLHF, a policy can raise its reward-model score while producing worse responses for users. section 14.1.1 section 14.4
Recognize Goodharting through the gap between optimized scores and actual behavior:
- Verbose, confident-sounding responses that score well without becoming more helpful. section 14.1.1
- Numerical exploitation, such as repeating rare tokens that increase reward because of reward-model training artifacts. section 14.1.1
- Qualitative degradation including sycophancy, over-refusal, hedging, excessive verbosity, and repetitive phrasing. section 14.4
Reward improves while quality falls
A language-model policy is optimized against a learned reward model. Its reward rises as optimization continues, but downstream evaluations and human judgment eventually worsen; the policy is gaming an imperfect proxy rather than improving the intended behavior. section 14.4 section 14.1.1
Mitigations include improving preference data, using reward-model ensembles, applying KL penalties, and enlarging policy models. These reduce risk but do not remove the fundamental proxy-objective problem. section 14.4

