liveBook · Manning

Hughes phenomenon

As explained in Data Without Labels

The Hughes phenomenon is the pattern in which a supervised classifier's performance improves as variables are added up to an optimum and then declines when additional variables are included with fixed training data.

The Hughes phenomenon describes a classifier whose performance improves as variables are added, reaches an optimum, and then declines when more variables are included with the same training data. It shows why adding every available attribute can reduce accuracy rather than improve it. section 3.2

Additional dimensions can make a supervised learning problem harder by increasing:

  • Mathematical complexity, including more complicated calculations between data points. section 3.2
  • Sparsity, because larger spaces contain fewer populated or complete observations. section 3.2
  • The risk that insignificant variables add complexity without contributing to accuracy. section 3.11 section 3.2

Adding attributes to a dataset

A dataset might begin with gender, then add age, education, and address. Its dimensionality increases with each attribute, but classifier performance eventually peaks and then falls if the added variables do not justify their cost. section 3.2

How Data Without Labels covers it

How deep it goes
Defines the performance peak and decline, and connects them to complexity and sparsity without detailing a selection algorithm.
Examples
Uses gender, age, education, and address as successively added attributes, plus a curve showing performance first rising and then falling.
What you can do after
Evaluate whether added variables justify their effect on classifier accuracy and remove dimensions that contribute little.
How it connects
Connects the Hughes phenomenon to the curse of dimensionality, overfitting, and dimensionality reduction.

Related concepts

This explainer was generated by Manning's knowledge graph from the text of Data Without Labels. The section links point to the parts of the book it draws on.