liveBook · Manning

Inversion of control

As explained in Kafka Streams in Action, Second Edition

Inversion of control is a design principle in which a framework or container controls object creation and dependency wiring instead of the application doing so directly.

Inversion of control (IoC) moves responsibility for object creation and dependency wiring from the application to an external container. The application depends on interfaces, while the container supplies concrete collaborators. section 12.0 section 12.1

A payment processor illustrates the control shift:

  • Without IoC, the processor creates and controls its collaborating components, including their concrete types. section 12.1
  • With IoC, the processor retains only an interface reference, such as NetworkClient, and receives its implementation externally. section 12.1
  • Dependency injection achieves IoC through constructors, setter methods, or direct field injection. section 12.1
  • Interface-based wiring allows implementations to change and lets tests supply mock instances. section 12.1

How Kafka Streams in Action, Second Edition covers it

How deep it goes
Defines IoC, contrasts direct instantiation with interface injection, and identifies constructor, setter, and field injection.
Examples
Uses a payment processor, NetworkClient interface, SecureNetworkClient implementation, constructor injection, and mock instances.
What you can do after
Build flexible, testable Java components by injecting interface-based dependencies with Spring.
How it connects
Connects dependency injection, interfaces, Spring, component wiring, and test doubles.

Also explained in

Compare how 3 books explain inversion of control →

Related concepts

This explainer was generated by Manning's knowledge graph from the text of Kafka Streams in Action, Second Edition. The section links point to the parts of the book it draws on.