liveBook · Manning

Promise theory

As explained in Authorization in Action

Promise theory is a model of cooperation in which autonomous participants make behavioral promises that others may choose to rely on.

Promise theory models cooperation among autonomous participants: each makes behavioral promises, while others decide whether those promises are reliable enough to trust. It replaces centralized command with locally governed commitments. section 18.7

Cross-domain cooperation relies on several reinforcing commitments:

  • Legal agreements define responsibilities, liabilities, and audit requirements. section 18.7
  • Technical protocols and schemas make interactions predictable. section 18.7
  • Agent promises constrain local behavior, such as payment limits, receipt requirements, and signed records. section 18.7

Contractor reimbursement

A payment agent promises to process only reimbursements below a defined amount, in an approved currency, with receipts, and to return signed transaction records. A delegation credential then narrows the authority further by adding purpose, contractor, category, and expiry constraints. section 18.7

How Authorization in Action covers it

How deep it goes
Defines promises through a reimbursement scenario and connects them to policies, credentials, reputation, and audit records.
Examples
Uses contractor reimbursement payments, receipts, amount and currency limits, signed records, and expiring delegation credentials.
What you can do after
Evaluate/understand partner promises and grant bounded authority while preserving local policy control and shared audit trails.
How it connects
Connects autonomy with policy, delegation, credentials, reputation, governance, protocols, and auditability.

This explainer was generated by Manning's knowledge graph from the text of Authorization in Action. The section links point to the parts of the book it draws on.