liveBook · Manning

Quantitative evaluation

As explained in The Art of AI Product Development

Quantitative evaluation assesses a system using numerical metrics computed against defined inputs and desired outputs.

Quantitative evaluation measures a search system’s accuracy and relevance over time by comparing actual results with defined desired outputs. It creates a repeatable baseline for judging future optimizations as usage grows. section 7.2.3

A practical evaluation process includes:

  • Build ground truth from diverse queries that represent real user needs and specify desired results. section 7.2.3
  • Manually rate the relevance of retrieved documents for each benchmark query. section 7.2.3
  • Track precision, which indicates how many retrieved documents are relevant, alongside recall, which measures how many relevant documents were found. section 7.2.3

Search benchmark

A search team can test queries such as “best practices for workflow automation,” “customer feedback on the freemium plan,” and “API integration case studies,” then compare retrieved documents with manual relevance judgments. section 7.2.3

How The Art of AI Product Development covers it

How deep it goes
Defines ground truth, benchmark queries, manual ratings, precision, and recall without detailing implementation formulas.
Examples
Uses workflow automation, freemium-plan feedback, and API integration case studies as benchmark queries.
What it assumes
Assumes search queries and document relevance, while establishing how to create ground truth and performance baselines.
What you can do after
Evaluate search performance by building benchmark queries, rating retrieved documents, and tracking precision and recall.
How it connects
Connects search evaluation with ground truth, relevance, annotation, precision, recall, and qualitative evaluation.

Related concepts

This explainer was generated by Manning's knowledge graph from the text of The Art of AI Product Development. The section links point to the parts of the book it draws on.