Review Board is an open-source, web-based code-review tool for teams choosing between self-hosted infrastructure and a hosted service. It supports repositories using Git, Subversion, and Mercurial. section 3.2.2
Review Board supports several review workflows:
- Pre-commit reviews for examining changes before they are committed. section 3.2.2
- Post-commit reviews for examining changes after they are committed. section 3.2.2
- Side-by-side image diffs for reviewing image changes. section 3.2.2
Choosing with the team
Shortlist Review Board alongside other tools, then use a free plan or trial to test whether its review workflows and hosting model fit the team. section 3.2.2
Table 3.2 Comparison of code review tools
|
Tool / Platform
|
VCS support
|
Pricing tiers
|
Scalability
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GitHub
|
Git
|
Free and paid plan
|
Good for all team sizes
|
Free basic plan, widely used, easy to learn, good integration with GitHub ecosystem
|
Limited review features in the free plan
|
|
GitLab
|
Git
|
Free and paid plan
|
Good for all team sizes
|
Feature-rich, good value for open source projects
|
Can be overwhelming for some teams; limited self-hosting features in the free tier
|
|
Gerrit
|
Git
|
Free and paid plan
|
Good for large codebases
|
Open source, highly scalable, advanced features for code reviews
|
Requires self-hosting, steeper learning curve, and Java to run
|
|
Crucible
|
Git, SVN, and Mercurial, CVS, Perforce
|
Paid only
|
Good for large teams
|
Security and quality focus, powerful integrations with other Atlassian tools, and advanced code quality checks
|
Paid only; might be too much for smaller teams
|
|
Rhodecode
|
Git, SVN, Mercurial
|
Paid only
|
Good for large organizations
|
Open source, self-hosted, highly customizable workflows; supports multiple VCS
|
Paid only; may require more technical expertise to set up and manage; less active development community
|
|
Collaborator
|
Git, SVN, Mercurial, CVS, TFS, Perforce
|
Paid only
|
Good for small/ medium teams
|
Strong SVN support, advanced features like code search and integrations; self-hosting option
|
Paid plans only; aging interface
|
|
Review Board
|
Git, SVN, Mercurial, CVS, Perforce, Azure DevOps/TFS, Bazaar, HCL VersionVault
|
Free and paid plan
|
Good for all team sizes
|
Mature tool with flexible deployment options (self-hosted/web-hosted), strong access control features, open source, customizable, and good community support
|
Paid plans can be expensive; some features require paid plugins
|
Compare Review Board with alternative code-review tools across version-control support, pricing, scalability, strengths, and limitations. section 3.2.2
