A review criterion is a stated standard for judging whether a conference submission is suitable and strong. Use published criteria to shape the proposal, bio, title, and abstract before submitting. section 16.3.2
Check the submission against four practical questions:
- Content: Is the session coherent, relevant, high-quality, and deliverable effectively? section 16.3.2
- Originality: Does it offer new ideas, approaches, or an original delivery? section 16.3.2
- Relevance: Will it provide insights or information that matter to the conference audience? section 16.3.2
- Speaker fit: Do the proposed speakers have suitable expertise aligned with the subject? section 16.3.2
A revision test
Before submitting a proposal, compare its content, originality, relevance, and speaker fit with the conference’s published criteria. Revise weak areas, then keep a copy outside the submission form. section 16.3.2
