liveBook · Manning

Serial dependence

As explained in Experimentation for Engineers

Serial dependence is correlation between measurements arising from their order or from persistent system dynamics.

Serial dependence, or autocorrelation, occurs when measurements are correlated because of sampling order or persistent system dynamics. Predictability between measurements signals nonindependence, even when observations are not strictly sequential. section 8.1.1

Repeated measurements understate uncertainty

Ten observations containing eight repeated 1.5 values plus 2.3 and 3.1 produce an estimated standard error of 0.16. Sampling one value per independent measurement instead gives 1.5, 2.3, and 3.1, with a standard error of 0.38. The repeated run makes the data appear more precise than they are. section 8.1.1

Practical safeguards include:

  • Sample less frequently than the dependence-decay interval; this reduces correlated measurements but discards potentially useful data. section 8.1.1
  • Model the serial dependence when discarding observations is too costly. section 8.1.1

How Experimentation for Engineers covers it

How deep it goes
Explains causes, a numerical consequence, and sampling mitigation, but stops short of detailing dependence-model construction.
Examples
Uses repeated measurements, trade costs, ad clicks, and music skips to illustrate correlated observations.
What it assumes
Assumes familiarity with independent measurements and standard error while distinguishing measurement error from system dynamics.
What you can do after
Diagnose serial dependence, adjust sampling frequency, and recognize when standard-error estimates are misleading.
How it connects
Connects serial dependence to autocorrelation, independent measurements, standard error, measurement error, and system dynamics.

This explainer was generated by Manning's knowledge graph from the text of Experimentation for Engineers. The section links point to the parts of the book it draws on.