liveBook · Manning

Sunk cost fallacy

As explained in Collaborative Software Design: How to facilitate domain modeling decisions

A reasoning error in which prior investments of time, effort, or money improperly influence continuation of an endeavor despite its current costs and benefits.

The sunk cost fallacy makes people continue an endeavor because they have already invested time, effort, or money, even when current costs outweigh benefits. section 11.3.2

The model that became too valuable to discard

A team has worked on an existing model for months, enduring frustration and repeated iterations. New information contradicts it, but emotional attachment makes redesign feel like throwing away the team’s hard work. The team instead deforms the model to preserve it. section 11.3.2

Recognize how the fallacy operates:

  • Investment increases emotional attachment, making an existing model harder to discard. section 11.3.2
  • Contradictory information can trigger model fitting: deforming, extending, or omitting elements to protect the initial model. section 11.3.2
  • Availability bias, loss aversion, and sunk cost can reinforce one another, often unconsciously. section 11.3.2

How Collaborative Software Design: How to facilitate domain modeling decisions covers it

How deep it goes
Explains the investment mechanism, its emotional effect, and its interaction with model fitting and other biases.
Examples
Uses a months-old model, repeated iterations, frustration, and contradictory information as the central example.
What you can do after
Evaluate whether current costs and benefits justify continuation instead of preserving work because of past investment.
How it connects
Connects sunk cost fallacy with model fitting, loss aversion, and availability bias.

Related concepts

This explainer was generated by Manning's knowledge graph from the text of Collaborative Software Design: How to facilitate domain modeling decisions. The section links point to the parts of the book it draws on.