The superficial alignment hypothesis claims that pretraining supplies nearly all knowledge and capability, while alignment mainly teaches which interaction formats or styles a model should use. section 1.4
The hypothesis implies a particular view of post-training:
- A pretrained model already contains broad capabilities, but expresses them through next-token prediction rather than useful question-answering. section 1.4
- A small instruction-tuning dataset may substantially change behavior and improve narrow evaluations, without unlocking more difficult capabilities. section 1.4
- The hypothesis therefore treats alignment as largely stylistic, but broader performance may depend strongly on data scale and selection. section 1.4
Small-data alignment
A few thousand instruction-tuning examples can improve AlpacaEval, MT Bench, or Arena results, yet those gains need not transfer to challenging capabilities. section 1.4
