liveBook · Manning

Confusing communication

As explained in Collaborative Software Design: How to facilitate domain modeling decisions

Confusing communication is communication containing contradictory statements, behavior, or signals that make a person's position or intent difficult to interpret.

Confusing communication combines contradictory statements, behavior, or signals, making a person’s position or intent difficult to interpret. During collaborative modeling, it often appears when people reach an uncomfortable edge. section 8.1.2

Look for mismatches between what people say and how they participate:

  • Absence: someone is physically present, nodding and smiling, but mentally checked out and no longer participating. section 8.1.2
  • Interruption: people increasingly prevent others from finishing, especially around particular topics or minority opinions. section 8.1.2
  • Mixed signals: someone says, “Everything is fine,” or agrees with a decision, then does not attend the meeting. section 8.1.2

Notice the mismatch

A cat that begins grooming itself just before a fight illustrates edge behavior: an observable action contradicts the surrounding situation. In group work, observe when interruptions occur, who is interrupted, and whether minority views trigger them. section 8.1.2

Figure 8.1 Edge behavior happens when someone tries to oppress their inner shadows, but we can observe it because the unconscious behavior contradicts what we observe in the conscious behavior. As mentioned in chapter 5, when words and music don’t go together, they point to a missing element.

Use the figure to examine how conscious communication can conflict with less conscious behavior and reveal a missing element. section 8.1.2

How Collaborative Software Design: How to facilitate domain modeling decisions covers it

How deep it goes
Defines the pattern and gives observable signs, but stops short of a complete intervention framework.
Examples
Uses cat grooming, meeting absence, apparent agreement, physical presence, interruptions, and minority-opinion reactions as examples.
What you can do after
Diagnose/debug with it by recognizing mismatches, observing interruption patterns, and identifying ambiguity during group work.
How it connects
Ties confusing communication to edge behavior, mixed signals, conflict resolution, collaborative modeling, and minority opinions.

Related concepts

This explainer was generated by Manning's knowledge graph from the text of Collaborative Software Design: How to facilitate domain modeling decisions. The section links point to the parts of the book it draws on.