Betweenness centrality measures how often a node appears on shortest paths between other node pairs. High-scoring nodes act as bridges and may influence information flow. section 10.1.6
Use the metric to:
- Highlight connectors between otherwise weakly connected research communities. section 6.2
- Find potential bottlenecks, vulnerabilities, and nodes worth monitoring in fraud networks. section 10.1.6
- Compare a node’s bridging role with closeness centrality’s measure of reachability. section 10.1.6
Fraud-network analysis
Compute scores with NetworkX, optionally normalize them to 0–1, round results, and identify key bridges by selecting nodes above the average score. Node A is a prominent bridge in the illustrated fraud graph, while several nodes score zero. section 10.1.6
Figure 6.4 The intellectual influence network comprises the relations TALKED_ABOUT, TALKED_WITH, WORKS_WITH, and STUDENT_OF. Node styling is based on their betweenness centrality score.
Explore an intellectual influence network whose node sizes reflect betweenness centrality, making bridge-like researchers visually prominent. section 6.2


