liveBook · Manning

Estimator consistency

As explained in Causal AI

Estimator consistency is the property that an estimate approaches the true parameter value as the amount of data increases.

Estimator consistency measures whether an estimate converges toward a parameter’s true value as the amount of data increases. Because an estimator is computed from random data, it is itself a random variable with a distribution. Consistency asks how that distribution behaves as more observations become available. section 2.3.4 section 2.3.4

Use consistency to assess estimation methods alongside related statistical and computational properties:

  • Distinguish consistency from unbiasedness: unbiasedness concerns the estimator’s mean, whereas consistency concerns convergence with more data. section 2.3.4
  • Check whether the estimator scales with the dataset and can be parallelized, not merely whether it converges theoretically. section 2.3.4
  • Treat computational behavior as a practical constraint when estimating causal parameters in applications. section 2.3.4

Convergence in an application

A consistent estimator may approach the true parameter with more data, yet still be unsuitable for an iPhone app if convergence takes too long or consumes excessive battery. section 2.3.4

How Causal AI covers it

How deep it goes
Defines convergence and contrasts it with unbiasedness, then extends evaluation to scaling and parallelization.
Examples
Uses true-parameter recovery and an iPhone application constrained by convergence time and battery consumption.
What you can do after
Evaluate estimators by convergence toward true values and by practical scaling and execution requirements.
How it connects
Connects estimator consistency with bias, statistical estimation, causal parameters, scalability, and parallelization.

Related concepts

This explainer was generated by Manning's knowledge graph from the text of Causal AI. The section links point to the parts of the book it draws on.