liveBook · Manning

Fair use

As explained in Introduction to Generative AI, Second Edition

Fair use is a legal doctrine that permits certain limited uses of copyrighted works without authorization, depending on contextual factors defined by law.

Could a professor hand out copies of a painting for an art history lecture? Could someone sell T-shirts bearing the same image? Copyright gives creators exclusive rights to works of expression, but those rights are not absolute. Fair use is the legal doctrine that can permit use of copyrighted material without the copyright holder’s permission. section 4.11

Under the US Copyright Act of 1976, fair use depends on four factors. One is the purpose and character of the use: nonprofit or educational use is more likely to qualify than commercial use. A use may also be transformative if it fundamentally changes the work and serves a purpose different from simply consuming or enjoying the original. None of these descriptions makes every use in a category automatically fair. section 4.11

Figure 4.6 The four factors that determine fair use of copyrighted materials [47]
A white text on a blue background

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

The figure brings together the four factors used to assess fair use. section 4.11

Parody and permission

Courts have typically considered parody fair use. “Weird Al” Yankovic’s comic rewritings of copyrighted songs illustrate the distinction between what fair use may permit and what a creator chooses to do: he says he still seeks permission to maintain relationships with the original writers. section 4.11

Fair use is also central to disputes over copyrighted works used to train generative AI. Licenses offer another route for allowing reuse, sometimes with conditions such as attribution or noncommercial use. Whether fair use or licensing resolves disputes over AI training remains contested; neither is a blanket answer to every use of creative work or code. section 4.11 section 4.12

How Introduction to Generative AI, Second Edition covers it

How deep it goes
Defines the doctrine and explains purpose and transformative use, but does not spell out all four factors in the supplied passage.
Examples
Contrasts classroom painting handouts with printed T-shirts, and uses song parody and Copilot litigation as further cases.
What it assumes
Defines copyright as exclusive rights to creative expression before introducing fair use, without requiring prior legal knowledge.
What you can do after
Evaluate/understand why permission-free reuse requires contextual assessment rather than assuming all educational, transformative, or AI-training uses qualify.
How it connects
Connects fair use to copyright, transformative use, parody, generative AI training, and open source licenses.

Related concepts

This explainer was generated by Manning's knowledge graph from the text of Introduction to Generative AI, Second Edition. The section links point to the parts of the book it draws on.