A maturity level measures how developed and capable an organization’s threat-hunting practice is. Five levels range from Initial to Optimizing, with higher levels representing stronger capabilities. section 2.8.1
The five-level model progresses through these capabilities:
- Initial: relies mainly on security monitoring and detection tools; hunting is little, nonexistent, or infrequent and ad hoc. section 2.8.1
- Managed: establishes the practice, assigns a threat-hunting role, and conducts ad-hoc searches through senior analysts. section 2.8.1
- Defined: formalizes the process, creates a dedicated team, uses searches and statistics, and connects hunting with threat intelligence and monitoring. section 2.8.1
- Quantitatively Managed: conducts regular hunts with advanced analytics, broad data access, situational awareness, and metrics that drive improvement. section 2.8.1
Organizations may span levels across capabilities. A weighted score calculator handles these mixed profiles, giving greater importance to regular expeditions and situational awareness than to formally defining the hunter role. section 2.8.2
Assessing and improving a practice
Review current capabilities, score the organization, identify gaps, recommend improvements, and create a three-year roadmap showing the target maturity level for each year. Collect relevant artifacts and interview the people involved. section 2.9 section 2.10
