liveBook · Manning

Preference data

Preference data is a collection of judgments or comparisons indicating the relative preference or quality of alternatives, often model outputs.

How 2 Manning books explain it

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback

A pairwise comparison is an evaluation that determines which of two items is preferred.

How it is used
Supplies proxy judgments for reward modeling, preference fine-tuning, and RLHF when desired behavior lacks a precise reward function.
How deep it goes
Details formats, on-policy sourcing, collection operations, and bias, while leaving pairwise adequacy and annotator demographics as open questions.
Examples
Uses Likert rankings, correct-versus-incorrect mathematical answers, constrained goldfish poems, and AI-judged completion pairs.
What you can do after
Operate/configure preference-data collection by selecting label formats, seeking on-policy generations, and monitoring transferable biases.

Read how Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback explains preference data →

Machine Learning System Design

Pairwise comparison is an evaluation technique that asks a rater to compare two alternatives rather than assign an absolute score to one alternative.

How it is used
Frames pairwise comparison as a labeling design for evaluating alternatives such as chatbot responses.
How deep it goes
Explains ternary judgments and variance reduction, then qualifies majority voting without deriving a broader preference model.
Examples
Uses chatbot answers, correctness and tone criteria, ternary A-or-B judgments, and three labelers with 70% individual accuracy.
What you can do after
Evaluate alternatives with lower-variance ternary comparisons while checking whether labelers’ errors are correlated.

Read how Machine Learning System Design explains preference data →

Related concepts

These guides are generated from the text of Manning books by Manning's knowledge graph and link to the sections they draw on. The full books are available on liveBook and at manning.com.