liveBook · Manning

Posterior probability

As explained in Bayesian Optimization in Action

A posterior distribution is a probability distribution representing updated beliefs about unknown quantities after incorporating observed data.

A posterior probability or distribution is an updated belief about an unknown quantity after observing data. It combines a prior belief—an initial guess—with how likely the observation is under possible values of that quantity. Evidence matters only when it is relevant: a nearby house sale can narrow an estimate of a home’s price, while an unrelated sale may leave it unchanged. section 2.1

Conditioning is the update viewed as deriving a distribution given an observation. For a multivariate Gaussian, observing one variable produces a posterior Gaussian with updated means and variances. Correlated variables shift toward information from the observation and become more certain; uncorrelated variables need not change. At the observed value itself, posterior uncertainty is zero. section 2.2.2 section 2.2.3

A posterior makes three practical features visible:

  • The prior affects where updating starts; the same evidence can yield different posterior probabilities for people with different initial beliefs. section 3.1
  • Correlation controls where information travels: observations influence similar or nearby variables more than distant ones. section 2.2.3
  • Uncertainty after an observation can guide a search, because a useful action reduces the entropy of the posterior distribution. section 6.1.2

From a broad estimate to a useful one

Suppose a home price is initially believed to lie between 150k and 300k. Learning that the neighboring home sold for 250k can update the belief to roughly 230k–270k. The update centers the estimate near relevant data and reduces its range. Learning the price of an unrelated house does not provide the same reason to revise the estimate. section 2.1

Figure 2.8 Conditioning a Gaussian on an observation is similar to tying a knot around that observation. All samples from the posterior distribution need to pass through the knot, and there’s no uncertainty at the observed point.

Use the knot analogy to see conditioning: every posterior sample passes through the observation, so uncertainty vanishes at that point. section 2.2.2

How Bayesian Optimization in Action covers it

How deep it goes
Defines posterior updates and works through Gaussian conditioning effects, but defers the closed-form derivation.
Examples
Illustrates updates with house prices, correlated variables, repeated psychic guesses, and a remote-control search.
What you can do after
Evaluate/understand how relevant observations shift predictions and reduce uncertainty under a Bayesian model.
How it connects
Connects Bayes’ theorem, conditioning, multivariate Gaussian distributions, covariance, and Gaussian processes.

Also explained in

Compare how 8 books explain posterior probability →

Related concepts

This explainer was generated by Manning's knowledge graph from the text of Bayesian Optimization in Action. The section links point to the parts of the book it draws on.