liveBook · Manning

Rant

As explained in Writing for Developers: Blogs that get read

A rant is a forceful, highly opinionated form of expression that presents criticism or enthusiasm in an emphatic manner.

A rant is a forceful, highly opinionated expression that turns criticism or enthusiasm into an emphatic argument. Its intensity can attract readers, but venting alone is not enough: add educational value, such as a warning, explanation, or way to avoid repeating the mistake. section 9.1.4 section 3.3.2

Make a technical rant useful by:

A technical rant

An article titled “Async Rust is a Bad Language” uses a deliberately provocative accusation, then supports it with an introduction to concurrency, a list of developer problems, documentation links, and code examples. The strong opinion supplies momentum; the primer and evidence supply value. section 3.3.2

How Writing for Developers: Blogs that get read covers it

How deep it goes
Combines emphatic opinion with explanations, examples, and prevention advice rather than stopping at emotional release.
Examples
Uses failed rewrites, criticism of Go, and a provocative critique of asynchronous Rust with code examples and documentation links.
What you can do after
Evaluate technical frustrations and turn them into evidence-backed warnings, explanations, and practical safeguards.
How it connects
Connects to technical criticism, rewrites, asynchronous programming, concurrency, and lessons learned.

Related concepts

This explainer was generated by Manning's knowledge graph from the text of Writing for Developers: Blogs that get read. The section links point to the parts of the book it draws on.