liveBook · Manning

Review request

As explained in Writing for Developers: Blogs that get read

A message asking someone to examine a document and provide feedback.

A review request asks someone to examine a document for particular problems and provide useful feedback. Make it specific: name the reviewer's focus, identify the intended reader when relevant, and avoid wording that pressures them to approve the draft. section 6.5.2

Use a review request to give feedback a clear target:

  • Ask technical reviewers to check inadequate detail, factual errors, omissions, and irrelevant digressions. section 6.5.2
  • Ask clarity reviewers to mark missing reader context, abrupt transitions, circular flow, and confusing sentences. section 6.5.2
  • Put document-wide questions in the message and questions about particular passages in in-document comments. section 6.5.2
  • Replace “How do you like it?” with an invitation to give candid, constructive criticism. section 6.5.2

A focused request

“Please check whether the target reader needs more context, whether any technical claims are inaccurate, and whether this code sample uses deprecated features.” section 6.5.2

How Writing for Developers: Blogs that get read covers it

How deep it goes
Specifies review targets, question scope, and comment placement, but does not define a formal review methodology.
Examples
Uses technical checks, reader-context questions, code-sample verification, and beta blog-post reviews as examples.
What it assumes
Assumes a draft, identifiable reviewers, and a defined audience or review purpose.
What you can do after
Apply it by writing focused requests that elicit candid, relevant feedback instead of vague approval.
How it connects
Connects peer review with technical writing, constructive criticism, and in-document comments.

Related concepts

This explainer was generated by Manning's knowledge graph from the text of Writing for Developers: Blogs that get read. The section links point to the parts of the book it draws on.