Risk acceptance defines which model responses may proceed without human confirmation and which conditions require expert review. section 8.2.4
A workable risk-acceptance approach combines boundaries with stronger checks:
- Accept responses within predefined, low-risk criteria; route boundary cases to human experts. section 8.2.4
- Review generated code as rigorously as human-written code through testing and inspection. section 8.2.4
- Use periodic or trigger-based verification when boundaries are difficult to define or risks remain broadly high. section 8.2.4
Verification cadence
A deployment might require verification once each quarter or after every hundredth response, while separately escalating unusual conditions. A hallucinated extreme prediction illustrates why a failed response should prompt investigation and clearer reruns, not automatic abandonment. section 8.2.4
