Uncertainty quantification assigns a numerical measure to how uncertain a prediction or inferred quantity is. In high-risk decisions such as Bayesian optimization, uncertainty complements the predicted average: two choices with the same expected value may differ greatly in reliability. section 1.2.1
Gaussian processes quantify predictive uncertainty by:
- Representing each prediction as a probability distribution rather than a single point estimate. section 2.0
- Using covariance functions to encode similarity and model how observations influence uncertainty. section 2.0
- Reporting confidence intervals that indicate the predictive level of uncertainty. section 1.2.1
- Retaining specified noise at observed data points when labels or observations are noisy, rather than forcing uncertainty to zero. section 1.2.1
Choosing a neural-network depth
Suppose a Gaussian process predicts 85% accuracy for both 15 and 25 layers. The 15-layer model has a 95% confidence interval of 84–86%, while the 25-layer model has an interval of 81–89%. Preferring 15 layers reflects greater certainty, not a higher predicted mean. section 1.2.1
Figure 1.3 Non-Bayesian models, such as ridge regressors, make pointwise estimates, while GPs produce probability distributions as predictions. GPs thus offer a calibrated quantification of uncertainty, which is an important factor when making high-risk decisions.
Compare pointwise ridge-regression estimates with Gaussian-process distributions and their calibrated confidence intervals. section 1.2.1
