Suppose a company assigns customers to receive a chatbot but many assigned customers never use it. If assignment barely changes chatbot usage, the assignment is a weak instrument. The instrument may technically satisfy relevance, yet its small effect on treatment makes the instrumental-variable estimate unstable and imprecise. section 9.3.2
The IV estimator divides the instrument–outcome association by the instrument–treatment association. When the denominator, such as E[D|Z = 1] − E[D|Z = 0] or cov(D, Z), approaches zero, small numerator errors become much larger, increasing estimator variance. section 9.3.2
A practical check compares repeated estimates under different instrument strengths:
- Generate synthetic data and estimate the causal effect 1,000 times. section 9.3.2
- Compare an instrument effect of 0.3 with a weaker effect of 0.1. section 9.3.2
- Expect the weaker instrument to produce a wider, higher-variance distribution of estimates. section 9.3.2
Figure 9.8 A lower effect of the instrument on the treatment variable leads to a higher variance in the estimation.
The figure visualizes how reducing the instrument’s effect on treatment increases the variance of the IV estimate. section 9.3.2
