liveBook · Manning

Effect size

As explained in Statistics Slam Dunk

An effect size is a quantitative measure of the magnitude of a difference or relationship between groups or variables.

Effect size measures how large a difference or relationship is, not whether it merely clears a significance threshold. It adds practical meaning to a significance test: a result can be statistically significant yet negligible in magnitude, or statistically insignificant yet comparatively large when few records are available. section 7.4.3 section 20.3

For two continuous groups, Cohen’s d standardizes the difference between their means by their average, pooled standard deviation. The resulting d estimate describes how many standard deviations separate the means; its sign depends on the order of the inputs, while its distance from zero indicates magnitude. section 13.8.3 section 12.7.3

Choose an effect-size test to match the data and companion significance test:

  • Use Cohen’s d, Hedges’ g, or Glass’s delta with continuous data alongside a t-test. section 20.3
  • Use Cramer’s V with categorical data alongside a chi-square test for independence. section 9.0
  • Use Hedges’ g when working with few records; use Glass’s delta when choosing one group’s standard deviation as the denominator matters. section 13.11

Home versus road officiating

Comparing NBA personal fouls per game, Cohen’s d was 0.089 in the 2018–19 regular season and 0.158 in the 2019 playoffs—both negligible. The postseason t-test was not significant, illustrating why magnitude and significance answer different questions. section 7.4.3 section 7.4.2

Read effect size beside, never instead of, a significance test. Significance testing uses record counts to assess a null hypothesis; effect-size testing does not. Do not reject or fail to reject a null hypothesis from an effect size alone. section 12.10 section 20.3

Figure 20.3 Effect size tests should complement or supplement, and not replace, significance testing. Cohen’s d, Hedges’ g, and Glass’s delta are effect size tests that were run to complement t-tests, where the data is continuous; Cramer’s V is an effect size test that was run to complement a chi-square test for independence, where the data is categorical rather than continuous. A Cohen’s d test, the most popular effect size test for continuous data, was run from the effsize package in chapters 7, 12, and 13 and from the effectsize package in chapter 13; Hedges’ g and Glass’s delta tests were run from the effectsize package in chapter 13 only. Cramer’s V was run twice in chapter 9, once from the questionr package and once from the rcompanion package.
CH20_F03_Sutton

Use this map to connect continuous and categorical data types to their effect-size tests, companion significance tests, and R packages. section 20.3

How Statistics Slam Dunk covers it

How deep it goes
Defines standardized mean differences, qualitative ratings, test selection, and record-count limits without deriving inferential formulas.
Examples
Uses home-versus-road fouls and free throws plus Gini coefficients for winning and championship teams.
What it assumes
Introduces effect size through plain comparisons of means, standard deviations, continuous data, and categorical data.
What you can do after
Apply it via R packages to quantify and classify differences while retaining companion significance tests.
How it connects
Connects t-tests, chi-square tests for independence, null hypotheses, standard deviation, and Cramer’s V.

Also explained in

Compare how 2 books explain effect size →

Related concepts

This explainer was generated by Manning's knowledge graph from the text of Statistics Slam Dunk. The section links point to the parts of the book it draws on.