liveBook · Manning

Separation of duties

Separation of duties is a control principle that distributes conflicting responsibilities among multiple people or roles so no individual can complete a sensitive operation alone.

How 2 Manning books explain it

Authorization in Action

Separation of duties is a control principle that assigns a sensitive process to multiple people so that no single person performs all conflicting responsibilities.

How it is used
Structures policy creation, approval, deployment, and review so conflicting responsibilities remain distributed across roles.
How deep it goes
Explains role boundaries and an operational workflow, while stopping short of detailed constraint syntax or runtime enforcement.
Examples
Uses an ACME policy workflow separating authoring, review, approval, coordination, and audit.
What you can do after
Evaluate authorization workflows for conflicting responsibilities and assign independent review, approval, coordination, and audit roles.

Read how Authorization in Action explains separation of duties →

Grokking Web Application Security

The four-eyes principle is a control requiring critical changes or actions to be reviewed by at least two people before implementation.

How it is used
Uses independent approval to catch security lapses before critical changes reach production.
How deep it goes
Explains approval roles, documentation, rejection authority, and code-review enforcement without detailing implementation internals.
Examples
Uses missile-launch key controls, critical-system changes, and GitHub pull requests with required approval and passing tests.
What you can do after
Apply it via GitHub, ticketing workflows, source control, and review policies to prevent unapproved critical changes.

Read how Grokking Web Application Security explains separation of duties →

Related concepts

These guides are generated from the text of Manning books by Manning's knowledge graph and link to the sections they draw on. The full books are available on liveBook and at manning.com.