liveBook · Manning

Replicability crisis

As explained in Grokking Statistics

The reproducibility crisis is a scientific reliability problem in which published findings cannot be consistently replicated by other researchers.

A replicability crisis occurs when researchers cannot consistently reproduce published findings. P-hacking—selecting data, variables, subgroups, model parameters, or random seeds to obtain a desired result—can help create this problem. section 9.14

Common warning signs and safeguards include:

  • Collecting only enough data to achieve a preferred result or removing inconvenient observations without justification. section 9.14
  • Holding out a validation dataset to test a model on data untouched during iterative testing. section 9.14
  • Recognizing confirmation bias, seeking contrary evidence, and gathering new data that could challenge the finding. section 9.14

When an outlier may be legitimate to remove

A sleep log includes zero hours after a 16-hour overnight drive. Excluding that unusual event may be reasonable when measuring normal sleep habits, but removing observations merely to improve a result is suspect. section 9.14

How Grokking Statistics covers it

How deep it goes
Explains causes, warning signs, safeguards, and one outlier example without developing formal replication procedures.
Examples
Uses selective data collection, subgroup shopping, favorable random seeds, and an unusual sleep-log observation as examples.
What you can do after
Diagnose p-hacking risks, use held-out validation data, and seek evidence that could challenge a preferred finding.
How it connects
Connects replicability crisis with p-hacking, validation datasets, confirmation bias, outliers, and machine learning.

Related concepts

This explainer was generated by Manning's knowledge graph from the text of Grokking Statistics. The section links point to the parts of the book it draws on.