liveBook · Manning

Feasibility

As explained in Interview Speak

The practical possibility of completing a requested outcome within available time, budget, system, and staffing constraints.

Technical feasibility means judging whether a requested outcome fits available time, budget, systems, and staffing. When expectations exceed those limits, explain the constraints tactfully rather than simply rejecting the request. section 3.7

A strong feasibility response should:

  • Describe a specific request that was unrealistic in its manner, cost, or timeframe. section 3.7
  • Use factual evidence to explain why the request was not feasible, avoiding subjective opinions. section 3.7
  • Offer workable alternatives or compromises and explain how you pursued delivery. section 3.7

Customized customer request

A customer-service representative received a highly customized product request on a short timeframe, bypassing the approved sales process. Instead of saying “That’s not possible,” he thanked the customer, explained that the order required sales involvement, and clarified the process. A stronger response would also connect the constraint to factual delivery limits and propose a workable next step. section 3.7

How Interview Speak covers it

How deep it goes
Defines feasibility through four constraints and prescribes evidence, alternatives, and compromises, without detailing a complete resolution.
Examples
Uses a customized product request, short timeframe, customer-service channel, and required sales process.
What you can do after
Practice/perform a tactful feasibility conversation using factual evidence and workable alternatives.
How it connects
Connects stakeholder management with evidence-based communication and compromise.

Also explained in

Compare how 4 books explain feasibility →

Related concepts

This explainer was generated by Manning's knowledge graph from the text of Interview Speak. The section links point to the parts of the book it draws on.