Alignment training makes an AI system’s behavior consistent with human goals and preferences. In causal analysis, that means moving beyond objective causal facts toward judgments people consider appropriate, such as responsibility. section 13.1.4
The distinction matters when objective causality is straightforward but interpretation is subjective. An LLM may identify events associated with a network slowdown, then apply human-specified criteria, legal theories, or case law to produce a judgment. section 13.1.4
Interpreting a network slowdown
A log shows Jake logging in, accessing a shared folder, launching a heavy process, and coinciding with a bandwidth spike and packet loss. Alignment asks the LLM to assess Jake’s responsibility in ways many humans would accept, rather than merely confirming the causal sequence. section 13.1.4
Aug 22 14:02:34 User "Jake" logged in from 192.168.0.105. Aug 22 14:03:12 Shared folder accessed by user "Jake" at //SERVER/shared-folder. Aug 22 14:03:20 File transfer initiated by "Jake" from local: /home/jake/documents to remote: //SERVER/shared-folder/documents. Aug 22 14:03:25 WARNING: Unusual network activity detected. User "Jake" launched file "heavy_process.exe" on //SERVER/shared-folder. Aug 22 14:03:30 Network performance alert: Bandwidth usage spikes at 95%. Aug 22 14:04:00 Network slowdown detected: Packet loss rate 35%.
Inspect the event sequence used to connect causal evidence with a human-aligned responsibility judgment. section 13.1.4





