liveBook · Manning

Alignment training

As explained in How Large Language Models Work

The alignment problem is the challenge of ensuring that an artificial system's goals and methods remain consistent with the goals and values intended by humans.

Alignment is the challenge of making an artificial system’s goals and methods remain consistent with human intentions. It appears when a goal is underspecified or when the system’s permitted actions are not sufficiently constrained. section 9.2.2

A system can pursue the stated target while missing the intended outcome, much as a contract can leave loopholes. The concern is genuine, but catastrophic conclusions require care: outcomes are probabilistic, and extreme intelligence or harmful intent does not make results certain. section 9.2.2

Alignment concerns can arise through familiar human and technical decisions:

  • Choosing a loss function that rewards an imperfect proxy for the desired behavior. section 9.2.2
  • Balancing executive compensation against shareholders’ wishes. section 9.2.2
  • Writing agreements whose wording leaves room for loopholes or evasive strategies. section 9.2.2

How How Large Language Models Work covers it

How deep it goes
Defines under-specification, gives human analogies, and introduces probabilistic objections without developing technical solutions.
Examples
Uses loss-function design, CEO compensation, legal loopholes, and hypothetical human-threatening systems as examples.
What you can do after
Evaluate/understand how incomplete goals and unconstrained methods can produce misaligned behavior and overconfident risk claims.
How it connects
Connects alignment with loss functions, machine learning, contracts, economics, and probabilistic outcomes.

Also explained in

Compare how 6 books explain alignment training →

Related concepts

This explainer was generated by Manning's knowledge graph from the text of How Large Language Models Work. The section links point to the parts of the book it draws on.