liveBook · Manning

Consistency

As explained in Effective Data Analysis

Consistency is the degree to which data conforms to defined rules, constraints, formats, and representations across records and sources.

Consistency measures whether data follows an organization’s rules, constraints, formats, and representations across records and sources. It is one dimension of data quality, alongside accuracy, completeness, and timeliness. section 11.3.2

Practical consistency checks include:

  • Standardizing timestamps from different sources to a specific time zone or using the local time consistently. section 11.3.2

Daily forecast validation

A daily forecast dataset can be tested for unique dates, humidity between 0 and 100, nonnegative wind speed, and absence of missing values. Embedding these checks in transformation steps catches problems before downstream users encounter them. section 11.3.2

How Effective Data Analysis covers it

How deep it goes
Defines consistency and demonstrates validation checks, but does not detail broader constraint-management design.
Examples
Uses timestamp normalization, daily forecast validation, date filtering, and inner joins with a users table.
What it assumes
Assumes organizational rules and constraints, while illustrating checks through a concrete ETL data-quality workflow.
What you can do after
Diagnose inconsistent datasets with automated uniqueness, range, positivity, and missing-value checks.
How it connects
Connects data quality with accuracy, completeness, timeliness, ETL, ELT, time zones, filtering, and joins.

Also explained in

Compare how 20 books explain consistency →

Related concepts

This explainer was generated by Manning's knowledge graph from the text of Effective Data Analysis. The section links point to the parts of the book it draws on.