liveBook · Manning

Cognitive bias

As explained in Cyber Threat Hunting

A systematic pattern in which human judgment or perception deviates from rational evaluation because of mental shortcuts, experiences, or preferences.

Cognitive bias is a systematic deviation from rational judgment caused by mental shortcuts, experience, or preference. In threat hunting, it can reduce the relevance and effectiveness of a hunt. section 2.5

Threat hunters should actively counter several recurring biases:

  • Confirmation bias searches for or interprets evidence to support an existing hypothesis while discounting contradictions. section 2.5
  • Present bias accepts an immediate finding instead of expanding the hunt to determine the threat’s full extent. section 2.5
  • Overconfidence bias overestimates capability and can discourage consultation with experienced colleagues or subject-matter experts. section 2.5
  • Anchoring bias gives excessive weight to initial information, even when it is incomplete or irrelevant. section 2.5

Testing a Dropbox hypothesis

A suspected connection to Dropbox appears benign, so the hunter tests the assumption instead of stopping at the first explanation. An osquery search finds no Dropbox process, while a socket query reveals PowerShell using an encoded command to reach the same destination. Decoding the command exposes behavior that contradicts the initial hypothesis and redirects the investigation. section 7.1.4

How Cyber Threat Hunting covers it

How deep it goes
Defines four biases and demonstrates confirmation-bias mitigation through an osquery pivot, but does not provide a broader debiasing framework.
Examples
Uses Dropbox connections, process listings, encoded PowerShell, command decoding, and genuine-file hash comparison as investigation artifacts.
What it assumes
Assumes a threat-hunting context while teaching the bias definitions and investigation discipline needed to question assumptions.
What you can do after
Diagnose/debug with osquery by challenging initial hypotheses, pivoting from process names to sockets, and examining contradictory evidence.
How it connects
Connects cognitive bias to threat hunting, hypothesis testing, osquery, PowerShell, and confirmation, present, overconfidence, and anchoring bias.

Also explained in

Compare how 3 books explain cognitive bias →

Related concepts

This explainer was generated by Manning's knowledge graph from the text of Cyber Threat Hunting. The section links point to the parts of the book it draws on.