liveBook · Manning

Human-in-the-loop

As explained in Building Reliable AI Systems

Human supervision of an AI system's outputs, decisions, and operation.

Human-in-the-loop supervision places people in the path of AI decisions or outputs. In high-stakes workflows, require human validation before outputs are acted on; production agents can pause for approval and resume execution. section 1.2.1 section 6.2.2

Use review where plausible output errors carry consequential risks:

  • Legal work: verify AI-generated content and citations against authoritative sources, and require human review before output reaches a court. section 1.2.1
  • Code generation: review complex logic carefully; pattern matching and boilerplate generation do not guarantee correctness. section 5.2.3
  • Production agents: use approval steps that can pause and resume agent execution. section 6.2.2

How Building Reliable AI Systems covers it

How deep it goes
Specifies legal review safeguards and agent approval steps, but gives no detailed human-review workflow implementation.
Examples
Uses fabricated legal citations, complex code logic, and agent execution checkpoints as review cases.
What you can do after
Apply human review before legal outputs reach court and retain careful review for complex code logic.
How it connects
Connects human review to retrieval-augmented generation, citation verification, code generation, AI agents, and LangGraph.

Also explained in

Compare how 17 books explain human-in-the-loop →

Related concepts

This explainer was generated by Manning's knowledge graph from the text of Building Reliable AI Systems. The section links point to the parts of the book it draws on.