Code review prevents complexity before integration by putting proposed changes through peer examination. Reviewers look for bugs, design problems, convention violations, and readability issues, while authors revise the code in response. section 3.2.1
Effective reviews depend on a small set of shared practices:
- Define what requires review and establish clear criteria. section 3.2.1
- Keep comments respectful and constructive so feedback improves the change rather than burdening the team. section 3.2.1
- Agree who has final authority when reviewers disagree. section 3.2.1
A review cycle
An author submits a change through a pull or merge request. Peers examine it, ask questions, suggest fixes, and approve it after revision; the change can then be merged. section 3.2.1









