liveBook · Manning

Precision

As explained in Grokking Statistics

Precision is the proportion of predicted positive cases that are actually positive.

Precision measures how often predicted positive cases are actually positive. In plain language: when the system raises an alarm, how often is the alarm right? section 8.9

Wolf alarms

A wolf-detection system with 94.7% precision is correct when identifying a wolf 94.7% of the time; the remaining 5.3% of alarms are false. A system with 0% precision makes every alarm a false alarm. section 8.9

Use precision carefully when judging classification systems:

  • Precision focuses on predicted positive cases and does not use true negatives. section 8.9
  • Compare it with recall: a system can make accurate positive predictions while still missing many real positives. section 8.9
  • Check class imbalance before trusting accuracy; a rare event can produce high accuracy even when the system never predicts it. section 8.9

How Grokking Statistics covers it

How deep it goes
Explains interpretation through confusion-matrix examples and contrasts precision with recall, while stopping short of other negative-focused measures.
Examples
Uses wolf-detection alarms, zero-percent and 94.7-percent precision, false alarms, and accuracy under class imbalance.
What you can do after
Evaluate classification alarms by interpreting correct positive predictions, false alarms, recall, and class-imbalance effects.
How it connects
Connects precision with recall, accuracy, confusion matrices, true negatives, false alarms, and class imbalance.

Also explained in

Compare how 20 books explain precision →

Related concepts

This explainer was generated by Manning's knowledge graph from the text of Grokking Statistics. The section links point to the parts of the book it draws on.