liveBook · Manning

Evaluation dataset

As explained in Build an AI Agent (From Scratch)

A collection of evaluation examples reserved for measuring a system's performance after development or tuning.

An evaluation dataset is a collection of representative user requests that can be run repeatedly against an agent. Across many scenarios, it makes outputs, component behavior, and trajectories observable—not just whether an answer looks right, but whether tools worked and the agent took a reasonable path. section 10.2.1

Choose cases from sources that serve different needs:

  • Public benchmarks provide standardized comparisons, but strong scores may not reflect product use. section 10.2.2
  • Custom cases reflect expected tasks; include different difficulty levels, domains, and edge cases. A small core set can grow over time. section 10.2.2
  • Production requests reflect real use patterns, though they often lack ground-truth labels. section 10.2.2
Table 10.2 Types of evaluation datasets

Type

Description

Pros

Cons

Benchmark

Standardized public evaluation sets (e.g., HotpotQA, GAIA, and SWE-bench)

Comparable across systems; validated difficulty and quality

May diverge from real use; risk of overfitting to the benchmark

Custom

Internally constructed evaluation sets designed to reflect real scenarios

Tailored to product needs; domain-specific evaluation

High build cost

Production

Real user requests and feedback collected in production

Most realistic evaluation; reflects real use patterns

Often lacks ground-truth labels

Compare benchmark, custom, and production datasets by their advantages and limitations before choosing cases. section 10.2.2

Use cases as a deployment gate

When a prompt, policy, or flow changes, run a small set of roughly 20–50 core cases in premerge CI and check for regressions. After merging, run a larger set in staging. An automated gate can block deployment when the overall pass rate falls below a chosen threshold. section 10.4.1

Keep the dataset current. Review operational data, analyze failures, update the error taxonomy and rubric or metrics, then add cases that capture emerging patterns. A fixed test set will not keep pace with changing users, environments, and external tools. section 10.4.2

How Build an AI Agent (From Scratch) covers it

How deep it goes
Details dataset sources, case selection, deployment-stage test sets, and ongoing updates; does not specify a dataset file format.
Examples
Names GAIA, SWE-bench, and HotpotQA, plus a 20–50-case premerge test set and a larger staging set.
What you can do after
Operate/configure it as a regression gate across CI and staging, then refresh cases as failure patterns change.
How it connects
Connects agent evaluation to benchmarks, production data, error analysis, rubrics, metrics, and CI/CD.

Also explained in

Compare how 27 books explain evaluation dataset →

Related concepts

This explainer was generated by Manning's knowledge graph from the text of Build an AI Agent (From Scratch). The section links point to the parts of the book it draws on.