liveBook · Manning

Evaluation dataset

As explained in Financial AI in Practice

A portion of data kept separate from model training for evaluation.

An evaluation dataset is kept separate from model fitting so performance can be measured on observations the model has not seen. A held-out test set provides this check; cross-validation repeats it across training and validation folds. For rare outcomes such as fraud, stratifying the split preserves similar class proportions and helps prevent an unrepresentative evaluation. section 5.3.5 section 8.2.2

Practical checks:

  • In fraud detection, a 70/30 stratified split keeps the fraud proportion near 0.1725% in both sets. section 8.2.2
  • For credit scoring, five-fold validation can provide more stable metrics; retain a hold-out set to guard against overfitting. section 5.3.5

How Financial AI in Practice covers it

How deep it goes
Demonstrates scaling, stratified train/test splitting, five-fold validation, and hold-out safeguards.
Examples
Uses credit-default XGBoost folds and a fraud-detection 70/30 split with matching class proportions.
What you can do after
Evaluate generalization with stratified test data or cross-validation, and check that rare-class proportions remain representative.
How it connects
Connects model evaluation to training/test splits, cross-validation, stratification, class imbalance, and overfitting safeguards.

Also explained in

Compare how 27 books explain evaluation dataset →

Related concepts

This explainer was generated by Manning's knowledge graph from the text of Financial AI in Practice. The section links point to the parts of the book it draws on.