A confusion matrix compares predicted intents with the correct intents for evaluation utterances, exposing where a classifier selects the wrong category or misses the right one. section 5.1.1
Read each prediction through four possible outcomes:
- True positive: the prediction matches the correct intent. section 5.1.1
- False positive: the classifier selects an intent that is incorrect, creating over-selection. section 5.1.1
- False negative: the classifier fails to select the correct intent, creating under-selection. section 5.1.1
- True negative: the prediction does not match an incorrect intent. section 5.1.1
Request_Agent evaluation
Seven utterances include four correct Request_Agent predictions, two false positives, and one missed match. This produces 80% recall, 66% precision, and a 0.72 F1 score. section 5.1.1
Figure 5.1 In a 2 × 2 confusion matrix, the possible outcomes are derived by comparing the predicted intent to the actual intent.
Inspect the 2 × 2 layout that derives outcomes by comparing predicted and actual intents. section 5.1.1













