liveBook · Manning

Hypothesis

As explained in Sutskever's List

A hypothesis is a proposed explanation or generative process whose plausibility is evaluated against observed data.

A hypothesis is a possible explanation for observed data or a process that could have produced it. Inductive inference keeps every hypothesis logically compatible with the evidence; Occam’s razor favors the simplest among them. These are complementary constraints: compatibility alone does not establish plausibility, while simplicity alone does not justify discarding alternatives. section 9.1.2

Cookies and number sequences

A chair moved beside an empty cookie jar fits both a child reaching for cookies and a burglar stealing them; the burglar cannot be ruled out on logic alone. Likewise, 1, 3, 5, 7 fits the simple prediction 9 as well as more complicated alternatives, but simplicity makes 9 preferable. section 9.1.2

How Sutskever's List covers it

How deep it goes
Defines compatibility and simplicity through intuitive examples, then sets up consideration of computable programs without detailing the weighting.
Examples
Uses a cookie-jar mystery and the sequence 1, 3, 5, 7 to contrast compatible explanations and simpler predictions.
What you can do after
Evaluate competing explanations by retaining those consistent with evidence and preferring simpler ones.
How it connects
Connects hypotheses to inductive inference, Epicurus’s principle of multiple explanations, and Occam’s razor.

Also explained in

Compare how 9 books explain hypothesis →

Related concepts

This explainer was generated by Manning's knowledge graph from the text of Sutskever's List. The section links point to the parts of the book it draws on.