liveBook · Manning

Fairness

As explained in Inside AI

Fairness is the property of treating people equitably and avoiding unjustified disparities in system outcomes.

Fairness means treating people equitably and avoiding unjustified disparities in system outcomes. For AI that affects citizens, fairness requires more than accurate predictions: systems should demonstrate a lack of bias and explain decisions in plain language. section 10.2

Criminal-justice decisions

Consider a program deciding whether someone should receive incarceration or probation. If medication or social support could address behavioral problems, relying on an opaque system may produce harmful and unfair outcomes. section 10.2

Fairness belongs within broader validation of reliability, privacy, transparency, and explicability. Systems affecting individuals need stringent technical and ethical review before deployment. section 10.2

How Inside AI covers it

How deep it goes
Defines fairness through equitable treatment and bias avoidance, but does not specify metrics or implementation procedures.
Examples
Uses criminal-justice decisions about incarceration or probation, including medication and social support as alternatives.
What you can do after
Evaluate AI decisions affecting citizens by checking for bias, comprehensible logic, and explainability before deployment.
How it connects
Connects fairness with bias, reliability, privacy, transparency, explicability, validation, and certification.

Also explained in

Compare how 10 books explain fairness →

Related concepts

This explainer was generated by Manning's knowledge graph from the text of Inside AI. The section links point to the parts of the book it draws on.