liveBook · Manning

Interpretability

As explained in Inside AI

Interpretability is the degree to which a model’s decisions or outputs can be understood and explained by people.

Interpretability is how well people can understand why an AI system produced an output or decision. Deep-learning models can make this difficult because they do not provide clear insight into their decision-making. section 5.8

The stakes rise when AI decisions affect people. Lending and criminal justice are examples where opaque decisions challenge transparency, accountability, and trust. section 11.17

For systems that directly affect people, safeguards should include:

  • Validation against technical and ethical standards, including reliability, fairness, and privacy. section 10.2
  • Clear logic and explanations in plain language for those affected. section 10.2
  • An understanding of how decisions were reached, not simply an assertion that the computer made them. section 11.17

How Inside AI covers it

How deep it goes
Explains why deep-learning outputs resist interpretation and states transparency requirements, but gives no interpretability techniques.
Examples
Uses lending and criminal-justice decisions to illustrate transparency concerns around black-box systems.
What you can do after
Evaluate high-impact AI systems for transparency, comprehensible logic, explanations, reliability, fairness, and privacy.
How it connects
Connects interpretability to deep learning, transparency, explicability, accountability, and trustworthiness.

Also explained in

Compare how 16 books explain interpretability →

Related concepts

This explainer was generated by Manning's knowledge graph from the text of Inside AI. The section links point to the parts of the book it draws on.