liveBook · Manning

Threshold

As explained in Statistics Slam Dunk

A significance threshold, or significance cutoff, is a prespecified probability cutoff used to decide whether statistical evidence is sufficiently inconsistent with a null hypothesis.

A significance threshold is a probability cutoff chosen before interpreting a statistical test. Compare the returned p-value with the cutoff to make a binary decision about a null hypothesis: reject it when the p-value meets the threshold, or fail to reject it when it does not. A 5% threshold (0.05) is common, though 1% and 10% are also used. section 20.2 section 7.4.1

The threshold sets a high bar for calling a result consequential: 5% is somewhat arbitrary but low. It does not replace context, because statistical significance depends on the observed difference, variation in the data, and record count. section 7.4.1 section 20.2

Testing home versus road foul calls

For 2018–19 NBA games, a Welch two-sample t-test returned p = 0.02727 for personal fouls. Because 0.02727 is below 0.05, reject the null hypothesis that home and road teams have equal mean foul calls. The result is statistically significant under that predefined cutoff. section 7.4.1

Thresholds also guide data preparation and model choices. A Shapiro-Wilk p-value at or below 0.05 is treated as evidence that a variable is not normally distributed, while regression predictors with p-values below 0.05 are retained in a reduced model. section 5.5.2 section 5.7.6

Figure 20.2 Significance tests start with a null hypothesis that is subsequently rejected or not rejected based on a p-value with a 5% threshold. Which significance test to run is conditioned on the data (usually, but not always, continuous versus categorical). Significance tests are usually run from base R functions, and the results are typically visualized through packaged functions.
CH20_F02_Sutton

Use this decision diagram to trace a significance test from null hypothesis through p-value comparison to rejection or non-rejection. section 20.2

How Statistics Slam Dunk covers it

How deep it goes
Defines the cutoff and applies it repeatedly, while deferring formal statistical theory behind the tests.
Examples
Uses NBA home-road fouls, free-throw attempts, normality checks, correlations with wins, and customer-collections treatments.
What it assumes
Introduces null and alternative hypotheses alongside p-values without assuming advanced statistical background.
What you can do after
Evaluate/understand whether a test result crosses a predefined cutoff and supports rejecting a null hypothesis.
How it connects
Connects null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, p-value, t-test, Shapiro-Wilk test, correlation test, and linear regression.

Also explained in

Compare how 13 books explain threshold →

Related concepts

This explainer was generated by Manning's knowledge graph from the text of Statistics Slam Dunk. The section links point to the parts of the book it draws on.