Correctness measures whether a model gives the right answer for a task with a determinate target. Training accuracy expresses this as the proportion of training examples classified correctly, but it is a measurement rather than a guarantee of real-world quality. section 10.1 section 14.1.1
Separate correctness from preference-based evaluation:
- Use correctness when a response has a clear right or wrong answer, such as identifying a president. section 10.1
- Use preference judgments when alternatives may all be correct or incorrect and must be compared for clarity, safety, helpfulness, or degree of error. section 11.2
- Interpret training accuracy separately from held-out accuracy: the former can rise while the latter falls through memorization, whereas proxy over-optimization changes the objective itself. section 14.1.1
Why correctness is not enough
A factual question can have a clear correct answer, while two poems may be judged by preference rather than correctness. Likewise, a response can maximize a reward model through verbosity or rare-token repetition without becoming more helpful. section 10.1 section 14.1.1































